STRICTA
2010:
STandards for Reporting Interventions
in Clinical Trials of
Acupuncture
Checklist of STRICTA 2010 items
Information to include when reporting interventions in a clinical trial of acupuncture
|
Item |
Detail |
|
1.
Acupuncture rationale |
1a)
Style of acupuncture (e.g. Traditional Chinese Medicine, Japanese, Korean,
Western medical, Five Element, ear acupuncture, etc) |
|
1b)
Reasoning for treatment provided, based on historical context, literature
sources, and/or consensus methods, with references where appropriate |
|
|
1c)
Extent to which treatment was varied |
|
|
2.
Details of needling |
2a)
Number of
needle insertions per subject per session (mean and range where relevant) |
|
2b) Names
(or location if no standard name) of points used (uni/bilateral) |
|
|
2c)
Depth of insertion, based on a specified unit of measurement,
or on
a particular tissue level |
|
|
2d)
Response sought (e.g. de qi or muscle twitch response) |
|
|
2e) Needle stimulation (e.g. manual, electrical) |
|
|
2f)
Needle retention time |
|
|
2g)
Needle type (diameter, length, and manufacturer or material) |
|
|
3.
Treatment regimen |
3a)
Number of treatment sessions |
|
4.
Other components of treatment |
|
|
5.
Practitioner background |
5)
Description of participating acupuncturists (qualification or professional
affiliation, years in acupuncture practice, other relevant experience) |
|
6.
Control or comparator interventions |
6a)
Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research
question, with sources that justify this choice |
|
6b)
Precise description of the control or comparator. If sham acupuncture or
any other type of acupuncture-like control is used, provide details as for
Items 1 to 3 above. |
Note: This checklist, which should be read in conjunction with the explanations of the STRICTA items, is designed to replace CONSORT 2010’s item 5 when reporting an acupuncture trial.